1,340 kWh/kW
State-level planning benchmark.
Annual solar production planning estimates
Each row uses the same state planning yield for every system size. Multiply kWh/kW-year by installed DC kW to get the annual production shown below.
| State | kWh/kW-year | 5 kW | 8 kW | 10 kW | 8 kW avg/day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 1,380 | 6,900 kWh | 11,040 kWh | 13,800 kWh | 30.2 kWh |
| Alaska | 1,000 | 5,000 kWh | 8,000 kWh | 10,000 kWh | 21.9 kWh |
| Arizona | 1,710 | 8,550 kWh | 13,680 kWh | 17,100 kWh | 37.5 kWh |
| Arkansas | 1,370 | 6,850 kWh | 10,960 kWh | 13,700 kWh | 30.0 kWh |
| California | 1,580 | 7,900 kWh | 12,640 kWh | 15,800 kWh | 34.6 kWh |
| Colorado | 1,490 | 7,450 kWh | 11,920 kWh | 14,900 kWh | 32.7 kWh |
| Connecticut | 1,210 | 6,050 kWh | 9,680 kWh | 12,100 kWh | 26.5 kWh |
| Delaware | 1,320 | 6,600 kWh | 10,560 kWh | 13,200 kWh | 28.9 kWh |
| Florida | 1,450 | 7,250 kWh | 11,600 kWh | 14,500 kWh | 31.8 kWh |
| Georgia | 1,400 | 7,000 kWh | 11,200 kWh | 14,000 kWh | 30.7 kWh |
| Hawaii | 1,600 | 8,000 kWh | 12,800 kWh | 16,000 kWh | 35.1 kWh |
| Idaho | 1,360 | 6,800 kWh | 10,880 kWh | 13,600 kWh | 29.8 kWh |
| Illinois | 1,300 | 6,500 kWh | 10,400 kWh | 13,000 kWh | 28.5 kWh |
| Indiana | 1,260 | 6,300 kWh | 10,080 kWh | 12,600 kWh | 27.6 kWh |
| Iowa | 1,320 | 6,600 kWh | 10,560 kWh | 13,200 kWh | 28.9 kWh |
| Kansas | 1,450 | 7,250 kWh | 11,600 kWh | 14,500 kWh | 31.8 kWh |
| Kentucky | 1,320 | 6,600 kWh | 10,560 kWh | 13,200 kWh | 28.9 kWh |
| Louisiana | 1,390 | 6,950 kWh | 11,120 kWh | 13,900 kWh | 30.5 kWh |
| Maine | 1,170 | 5,850 kWh | 9,360 kWh | 11,700 kWh | 25.6 kWh |
| Maryland | 1,320 | 6,600 kWh | 10,560 kWh | 13,200 kWh | 28.9 kWh |
| Massachusetts | 1,210 | 6,050 kWh | 9,680 kWh | 12,100 kWh | 26.5 kWh |
| Michigan | 1,200 | 6,000 kWh | 9,600 kWh | 12,000 kWh | 26.3 kWh |
| Minnesota | 1,250 | 6,250 kWh | 10,000 kWh | 12,500 kWh | 27.4 kWh |
| Mississippi | 1,400 | 7,000 kWh | 11,200 kWh | 14,000 kWh | 30.7 kWh |
| Missouri | 1,360 | 6,800 kWh | 10,880 kWh | 13,600 kWh | 29.8 kWh |
| Montana | 1,340 | 6,700 kWh | 10,720 kWh | 13,400 kWh | 29.4 kWh |
| Nebraska | 1,410 | 7,050 kWh | 11,280 kWh | 14,100 kWh | 30.9 kWh |
| Nevada | 1,700 | 8,500 kWh | 13,600 kWh | 17,000 kWh | 37.3 kWh |
| New Hampshire | 1,190 | 5,950 kWh | 9,520 kWh | 11,900 kWh | 26.1 kWh |
| New Jersey | 1,280 | 6,400 kWh | 10,240 kWh | 12,800 kWh | 28.1 kWh |
| New Mexico | 1,710 | 8,550 kWh | 13,680 kWh | 17,100 kWh | 37.5 kWh |
| New York | 1,210 | 6,050 kWh | 9,680 kWh | 12,100 kWh | 26.5 kWh |
| North Carolina | 1,390 | 6,950 kWh | 11,120 kWh | 13,900 kWh | 30.5 kWh |
| North Dakota | 1,300 | 6,500 kWh | 10,400 kWh | 13,000 kWh | 28.5 kWh |
| Ohio | 1,230 | 6,150 kWh | 9,840 kWh | 12,300 kWh | 27.0 kWh |
| Oklahoma | 1,490 | 7,450 kWh | 11,920 kWh | 14,900 kWh | 32.7 kWh |
| Oregon | 1,210 | 6,050 kWh | 9,680 kWh | 12,100 kWh | 26.5 kWh |
| Pennsylvania | 1,240 | 6,200 kWh | 9,920 kWh | 12,400 kWh | 27.2 kWh |
| Rhode Island | 1,220 | 6,100 kWh | 9,760 kWh | 12,200 kWh | 26.7 kWh |
| South Carolina | 1,410 | 7,050 kWh | 11,280 kWh | 14,100 kWh | 30.9 kWh |
| South Dakota | 1,390 | 6,950 kWh | 11,120 kWh | 13,900 kWh | 30.5 kWh |
| Tennessee | 1,360 | 6,800 kWh | 10,880 kWh | 13,600 kWh | 29.8 kWh |
| Texas | 1,480 | 7,400 kWh | 11,840 kWh | 14,800 kWh | 32.4 kWh |
| Utah | 1,530 | 7,650 kWh | 12,240 kWh | 15,300 kWh | 33.5 kWh |
| Vermont | 1,180 | 5,900 kWh | 9,440 kWh | 11,800 kWh | 25.9 kWh |
| Virginia | 1,340 | 6,700 kWh | 10,720 kWh | 13,400 kWh | 29.4 kWh |
| Washington | 1,120 | 5,600 kWh | 8,960 kWh | 11,200 kWh | 24.5 kWh |
| West Virginia | 1,220 | 6,100 kWh | 9,760 kWh | 12,200 kWh | 26.7 kWh |
| Wisconsin | 1,210 | 6,050 kWh | 9,680 kWh | 12,100 kWh | 26.5 kWh |
| Wyoming | 1,480 | 7,400 kWh | 11,840 kWh | 14,800 kWh | 32.4 kWh |
How to use this table
Use it to compare broad state-level solar resource, sanity-check an installer production claim or estimate output for a standard system size. It is not a substitute for a roof-specific forecast.
State solar yield is a planning estimate derived from NREL residential PV resource-class ranges, not a site-specific PVWatts result.
Why the same state can contain very different roofs
Production varies with latitude, local weather, elevation, shade, roof direction, roof tilt, inverter sizing and system losses. A state number is useful for screening and comparison, while a ZIP-level or address-level model is better for a purchase decision.